Fed Agents Seize 63 Dogs from Suspected Dog Fighting Ring (More)

U.S. Attorney Files Civil Lawsuit to Take Ownership of the Animals and Recover Costs of Care
U.S. Attorney Files Civil Lawsuit to Take Ownership of the Animals and Recover Costs of Care

The United States filed a civil forfeiture complaint seeking the possession of 63 pit bull-type dogs on March 23, 2018, that were allegedly involved in a dog fighting venture in violation of the federal Animal Welfare Act.

Pursuant to a federal warrant, the animals were seized on March 19, 2018, in Eastman, Georgia, by United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General (USDA-OIG) special agents working with the United States Marshals Service, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Georgia State Patrol (GSP), Oconee Drug Task Force, Dodge County Sheriff’s Office, and Georgia Department of Natural Resources.

FBI began collecting data on Crimes Against Animals in 2016, and is included for the first time in the recently released FBI's 2016 NIBRS Crime Data Report.
FBI began collecting data on Crimes Against Animals in 2016, as some studies say that cruelty to animals is a precursor to larger crime. Crimes against Animals is included for the first time in the recently released FBI’s 2016 NIBRS Crime Data Report.

According to the complaint filed last week in federal court, the animals were seized after GSP troopers conducted a traffic stop involving a vehicle inside of which an injured dog was found.

The operator of the vehicle admitted to having been present at a dog fight in Eastman, Georgia, and provided law enforcement with the location of the fight.

At the reported location, agents discovered a disassembled dog fighting “pit” and more than 60 pit bull-type dogs staked to the ground by heavy chains.

The condition of a majority of the dogs, including scarring and aggression towards other dogs, was consistent with dog fighting and related training.

After obtaining a search warrant, agents found numerous indications of dog fighting at the Eastman property, including a treadmill with a rope attached to the front part of the machine, antibiotics and other injectable veterinary medications, and a jenny mill, which is used to develop a dog’s endurance and musculature by enticing the animal to run on a circular track.

(Learn More. WARNING: Graphic Content. A four month-long investigation led to the rescue of 50 dogs from a suspected dogfighting operation in Sevier County, Tennessee, and the arrest of three people. Courtesy of The Humane Society of the United States and YouTube)

From four grave areas, agents unearthed the remains of seven dogs, five of which had scarring consistent with dog fighting and one of which had a broken leg.

During the search, agents noted that none of the live animals had access to food, and most did not have access to water.

Following the seizure, the United States Marshals Service took custody of the animals.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Wood
Acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Wood

K2 Solutions, Inc. and the Humane Society of the United States are assisting with the care of the dogs, at least some of which are pregnant.

“The Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division is pleased to have partnered with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the U.S. Marshals Service, and federal and state law enforcement in this joint effort to remove these animals from harm’s way, pursuant to federal law, as quickly as possible,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Wood for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.

United States Attorney Bobby L. Christine
United States Attorney Bobby L. Christine

“We applaud the agents and attorneys who worked tirelessly and acted on very little notice to achieve this successful outcome.”

“Dog fighting is a barbaric spectacle that has no place in any civilized society, and it will enjoy no quarter in the Southern District of Georgia,” said United States Attorney Bobby L. Christine.

“We know that animal fighting ventures often entail other forms of illegal activity involving drugs, firearms, and gambling, and this Office will continue to work with its law enforcement partners at all levels to investigate and successfully prosecute those who contribute to the proliferation of crime and seek to profit off the abuse and suffering of helpless animals.”

Special Agent in Charge Karen Citizen-Wilcox for USDA-OIG
Special Agent in Charge Karen Citizen-Wilcox for USDA-OIG

“The United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General-Investigations, actively investigates allegations of animal abuse,” said Special Agent in Charge Karen Citizen-Wilcox for USDA-OIG.

“This agency has made animal fighting a high priority in order to demonstrate that these blatant acts of cruelty to animals will no longer be tolerated.”

“We would like to thank United States Attorney’s Office for aggressively prosecuting perpetrators of animal fighting.”

Dog fighting is a violent contest in which two dogs that are bred and conditioned for fighting are released by their owners or handlers in a controlled environment to attack each other and fight for purposes of entertainment or gambling.

Fights usually end when one dog withdraws, when a handler “picks up” his dog and forfeits the match, or when one or both dogs die.

Persons engaged in dog fighting typically use “pit bull”-type dogs, which dog fighters prefer for their compact muscular build, short coat, and the aggression that some display toward other dogs.

(Learn More. WARNING: Graphic Content. Dog fighting is on the rise in the UK. In this sometimes disturbing film, Professor Green enters a secret world as he takes a closer look at the so-called ‘sport’ of illegal dogfighting. Courtesy of the BBC and YouTube)

The federal Animal Welfare Act makes it a felony punishable by up to five years in prison to fight dogs or to possess, train, sell, buy, deliver, receive, or transport them for that purpose.

The statute further authorizes the seizure and forfeiture of animals involved in dog fighting.

Animal Fighting Investigations Training

Once the dogs are forfeited or surrendered to federal authorities, they can be evaluated and placed for adoption.

Although federal funds will be used to pay for the care of the dogs while they remain in law enforcement custody, the Animal Welfare Act empowers the government to recover those costs from the dogs’ owners.

Assistant United States Attorneys Theodore S. Hertzberg and Xavier A. Cunningham are pursuing the forfeiture of the dogs on behalf of the United States.

USDA-OIG is leading the related federal investigation.

In 2014, the Department of Justice designated the Environment and Natural Resources Division as the centralized body within the Department responsible for tracking, coordinating, and working with the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices on animal cruelty enforcement matters.

Learn About the Animal Welfare Litigation Program

Together with the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) lawyers are working to ensure that full effect is given to the federal statutes and enforcement regimes that provide for the humane treatment of captive, farmed, and companion animals across the United States.

The principal federal agency that ENRD represents in this area is the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

(See the ASPCA on ground in Huntersville, NC, assisting law enforcement with the rescue and removal of 23 dogs from a property where they were allegedly used for fighting. Courtesy of the ASPCA and YouTube)

Where appropriate, ENRD’s Environmental Crimes Section (ECS) brings criminal prosecutions under these laws against, for example, people who are involved in the illegal blood sport of dog fighting.

In these cases, ECS works with investigatory agents from the Department of Agriculture’s Office of the Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other law enforcement agencies.

ENRD now has Departmental responsibility for affirmative litigation arising from the Nation’s animal protection laws, including: ENRD’s Wildlife and Marine Resources Section (WMRS) brings civil judicial enforcement actions that support and complement the administrative enforcement actions taken by the relevant federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

WMRS can also pursue civil remedies, such as civil forfeiture in animal-fighting cases.

  • The Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2131, et seq.
  • The Horse Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1821, et seq.
  • The Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1901, et seq.
  • The 28-Hour Law, 49 U.S.C. § 80502
  • The Animal Crush Video Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 48
  • The Animal Fighting Venture Prohibition Act, 18 U.S.C. § 49

DOJ-Banner

For an introduction to these laws, see the September 2015 volume of the United States Attorney’s Bulletin.

For more information on the Department’s efforts, visit: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/animal-welfare.